The road to scaling a startup is long, winding, and for many, very rewarding. For those with "skin in the game", the final pitstop can be, in many ways, life-changing.
As a result, many companies implement an employee share option scheme, allowing them to motivate and retain teams in a tax-effective way.
Below, we take a global perspective on employee share options, exploring their use in the UK, Europe, Australia, and the US. We'll explain what they are, how they differ from region to region, their basic legal frameworks, and more.
You can expect us to cover:
Employee share options are contractual rights given to employees, often as part of their benefits package. These options allow employees to purchase a certain number of shares in the company they work for, often for a predetermined price, known as the "exercise price" or "strike price". This price is fixed on the date the options are granted and remains unchanged throughout the life of the options. Setting a fixed price gives employees the opportunity to benefit if the company’s value increases over time, as they will still be able to purchase shares at the original grant price that was set when the options were granted. Options will give employees a personal interest in the success of the company, beyond the day-to-day wins of a scaling company. This can align employees with shareholder interests, retain staff for longer periods of service, and generally foster motivation to advance a company to "the next level".
Not only do share options serve as an incentive for employees to stay with a company longer, but they can also substantially financially benefit employees if the company's stock value increases, for example, if a company grows substantially and reaches an IPO (initial public offering).
At their most basic, employee share options reward an employee financially if the value of a company's stock price increases. By locking in a set exercise price, employees have the potential advantage if their company’s share value rises over time. When they exercise their options in the future, they’ll be able to buy the shares at this original price, even if the company’s market value has increased, allowing them to benefit from the company’s growth.
Depending on the rules of the plan, the company may set vesting conditions which determine when options become eligible for exercise. Think of vesting as employees earning the right to use their options. Options can vest after a certain date or when certain goals are met, employees can exercise those options once they’re vested.
Let's look at a quick example: Let's say a GenAI startup hired an engineer on January 1, 2024, and has added employee share options to their benefits package. The package includes 4,000 stock options with a 3-year vesting schedule and a 1-year cliff after which 50% of their options (2,000 shares) vest. Following the cliff, the remaining options will vest gradually over the next 2 years: 25% (1,000 shares) on January 1, 2026 and the final 25% (1,000 shares) on January 1, 2027. By this date, the employee’s 4,000 stock options are fully vested.
Once an option is vested, the employee can choose to exercise (purchase) it, depending on the conditions of their employment agreement or offer letter. If they leave the company during the vesting period, they may lose unvested options and will need to exercise any vested ones within a specific timeframe. This structure encourages long-term retention by rewarding employees as they continue working with the company.
Beyond vesting, it's important to address the exercise period. Once options are vested, there is a specific timeframe during which they can be exercised. Typically, this period will extend throughout an employee's tenure, but can (often depending on whether an employee was a "good" or "bad" leaver) continue following an employee's departure.
Exercise rights will vary from business to business, and will come down to the discretion of the employer and the terms of the initial share options agreement.
It's worth noting that the benefits of share options will vary from region to region, particularly when it comes to the legal and tax frameworks of each jurisdiction. Understanding these frameworks is key to delivering employee share options that are truly in the best interests of employees and employers.
The legal logistics of share options vary from region to region, but for the purposes of this article, we're going to address the UK, EU, Australia, and the US. Let's get right into it.
In the UK (more specifically, England and Wales), employee share options are comprised of several schemes, each with varying benefits and tax specifics. These include EMI shares (otherwise known as Enterprise Management Incentives), ESOPs (Employee Share Option Plans) and SIPs (Share Incentive Plans). Let's look at these a little closer.
EMI shares are particularly popular among smaller UK companies, thanks to their tax incentives. These shares are designed to help companies attract and retain talented employees, with the benefit of freeing said employees from paying Income Tax or National Insurance on the shares purchased.
ESOPs allow employees to acquire an equity stake in their company. ESOPs are not a one-size-fits-all solution, and the finer details will vary from region to region, meaning companies would be wise to understand the legal and tax differences between jurisdictions. In terms of benefits, ESOPs are particularly useful for attracting (and retaining!) talent, while equipping employees with a financial incentive that ties the success of the business with their own personal gain.
This plan can be popular with early-stage startups, as it allows them to provide competitive compensation while conserving often limited cash reserves.
SIPs allow employees to gain shares, free of income tax and national insurance costs. However, to avoid income tax and national insurance payments, these shares have to undergo a holding period of five years.
Under SIP, employees can receive free shares awarded by the employer, partnership shares purchased directly, matching shares given by the employer, or the accrual of dividend shares.
While UK share options offer a range of benefits for employees and employers alike, they're not necessarily simple to navigate. With that in mind, it can help to work with legal and tax experts to strategise the best plan for you and your team.
Unlike in the UK, US, and Australia, there isn't a unified EU-wide legal framework for employee share options. Individual countries within the EU will have their own legalities and tax treatments. As a result, some countries may have more tax-advantageous schemes, while others will be somewhat limited.
With this in mind, your share options (if spread across the EU), will need to comply with local legal requirements and compliance measures.
Your best bet? Consult with a lawyer familiar with the local laws for the country your employees are based in, and work together to strategise the best possible plan.
Australia offers a unique approach to employee share options through its employee share schemes (ESS). These schemes are particularly appealing as they provide tax incentives to both the employer and the employee while incentivising employees to see the success of the business as their own.
The key feature of Australia's ESS regulations lies in its flexibility. Employees can choose between receiving shares or options, allowing employers the freedom to design benefit schemes that fit their specific business needs.
Another standout aspect of Australian ESS is the startup concession, which allows employees of eligible startups to receive options at up to a 15% discount, with any gain on exercise being taxed as a capital gain. This contrasts with the usual practice of taxing gains as ordinary income, providing significant savings in the process. The startup concession is available to companies that have been incorporated for fewer than 10 years while having a turnover of no more than AUD $50 million and being incorporated for fewer than 10 years.
In the United States, employee share options are primarily governed by two types of plans: incentive stock options (ISOs) and non-qualified stock options (NSOs). The distinction between these two lies largely in their tax implications and eligibility requirements.
ISOs are designed to provide favourable tax treatment, allowing employees to purchase shares with potential tax advantages. However, these advantages come with conditions. To qualify, employees must hold stock for at least one year from the exercise date and two years from the grant date. If these holding periods are met, any profit will be taxed as a long-term capital gain, which usually carries a lower tax rate than ordinary income.
By comparison, NSOs are more flexible but less tax-favourable compared to ISOs. They can be offered to anyone, including advisors and board members, not just employees. When NSOs are exercised, the difference between the stock price and the exercise price is taxed as ordinary income. Companies often prefer NSOs for their simplicity in administrative management and broader applicability.
The regulatory framework for these options is governed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) while adhering to the Internal Revenue Code. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has introduced regulations to ensure transparency in executive compensation, including share options.
The eligibility criteria for employees to receive share options can differ significantly between regions. Let's delve into the specifics of each region.
Under the EMI scheme, employers can offer share options to any full-time employees or directors who work at least 25 hours per week or 75% of their total working time. However, there can be some limitations placed on senior managerial roles.
In Australia, employee share schemes are subject to specific regulatory guidance under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Most full-time, part-time, or casual employees of a company can be offered share options. The eligibility is often inclusive, with senior managers also entitled to participate, provided the company's share scheme complies with ASIC's prospectus requirements or its class ordering regime.
In the US, share option eligibility tends to be more standardized, with offerings typically directed towards employees, directors, and key consultants. Eligibility often includes considerations such as the employee's role, contribution, and rank within the company. Certain programs like the Incentive Stock Option (ISO) plan have specific requirements stipulating that participants must be employees, not contractors or board members.
Within the EU, eligibility can vary greatly due to differences in member states' regulations. Generally, larger and later-stage companies have the means to offer stock options more widely among their employees. However, some EU countries have favourable schemes such as free shares or tax-advantaged options that may only apply to certain types of employees or companies, potentially excluding senior managers or non-employees.
Ultimately, while many regions have legal frameworks in place to guide eligibility, companies within these regions have some degree of flexibility and discretion in deciding which employees are granted share options.
Employee share options offer a host of benefits, both to the company and the employees. For employees, options are an advantageous means of becoming stakeholders in their company, allowing them to ultimately profit from the successes of the business.
From a company's perspective, employee share options have a litany of benefits, from the attraction of hard-to-find talent to the retention of "star players" within the business. This is particularly crucial for startups or younger companies that might not have the capital to offer competitive salaries initially. Instead, they can provide a potentially lucrative benefit that gives employees a vested interest in the business.
Employee share options can also be a strategic tool for preserving cash flow, especially when cash reserves are low or when the company prioritizes investing in further development. By offering share options as part of the compensation package, companies can incentivise employees without compromising their growth potential.
Share options can also foster a culture of ownership and accountability. Employees who are part-owners are likely to adopt a shareholder mentality, advocating for cost-effective practices and innovative solutions that can drive profitability overall. This shift in mindset can lead to a healthier, more sustainable business environment that benefits everyone involved.
While offering share options involves strategic planning and adherence to legal frameworks, these options can significantly elevate a company’s appeal to a committed workforce eager to succeed.
Diving into employee share option schemes comes with its fair share of risks. While these opportunities can be financially rewarding, they require careful consideration and understanding.
Thoroughly understanding your company's proposed stock option plan, including its terms, associated risks, and potential financial implications, is essential for making informed and beneficial decisions regarding share options.
Preparing to explore options? Unsure of whether your existing system is working? Speak to one of our Shares and Incentives lawyers.
When delving into share option policies, there are nuances between the UK, the US, the broader EU, and Australia. These distinctions often lie in regulatory norms and fiscal benefits.
While the UK's framework is markedly employee-centric, with employee interest in stock options often surpassing other European regions, the EU remains a mixed bag, echoing a need for alignment and policy adjustments. Australia's approach, meanwhile, fosters comprehensive participation, balancing encouragement with regulation, while the US remains a hub for innovation-friendly environments.
These regional differences provide a telling insight into how governments influence share-options policies to reflect broader cultural, economic, and financial motivations.
When it comes to the tax implications of employee share options, the region in which they are issued plays a crucial role. For many, the taxation of options will greatly impact their perceived value to employees, so it’s also worth stating, that the tax implications of shares will vary from scheme to scheme. With that in mind, it can be very hard to give a “one-size-fits-all” answer for each country.
Put simply, tax is complex, and we always recommend you work with experts to ensure your money is well and truly managed. Below, we’ve taken a cursory look at some of the tax implications - but do be aware, we could talk about this topic for days!
Here’s how it can play out across different regions:
When every member of a business is working towards a shared goal, powerful things can happen. Worldwide, share schemes are increasing in popularity, thanks to potential tax benefits available to employees and employers alike.
Beyond tax, share schemes often galvanise teams, thanks to a shared financial incentive that aligns a company’s success with personal gain.
Exploring how to incentivize your employees? We operate worldwide to support scaling companies with tried-and-tested legal expertise that empowers teams and protects companies.
Get in touch with our shares and incentives lawyers to see how we can support you.
International law firm Biztech Lawyers elevates clients, providing vision and confidence to navigate global markets and seize opportunities.
Whether you’re looking for advice in a particular jurisdiction or exploring how we can help expand your business, discover more below.